The figure shows the inflow of energy from the sun, the losses of that incoming energy due to absorption in the atmosphere, etc., and the re-radiation of energy by infrared radiation from the earth's surface. Some of that energy is lost to space and some of it, 159 Watts/M2, is absorbed in the atmosphere. The Greenhouse Gas Effect (GHE) postulates that the the greenhouse gases re-radiate that stored energy back to earth raising it's temperature.
But this violates the 1st law of thermodynamics. The 1st law says that energy can be neither created nor destroyed, but can only change form. A particular consequence of this is that the total energy of an isolated system does not change. Thus the GHE is in violation of a law that has been well known for nearly 200 years because it claims that radiated energy from the earth's surface actually will raise the temperature when it is reabsorbed due to the GHE.
The GHE theory says that the earth re-radiates long wave radiation into the atmosphere which heats up the CO2 which then radiates infrared radiation omnidirectionally. Besides the violation of the 1st law of thermodynamics, energy transfers between different media involve losses not gains as postulated in the GHE theory. In other words, the CO2 in the atmosphere is a heat amplifier which is ridiculous.
Furthermore, the GHE theory totally ignores the adiabatic compression of the atmosphere due to gravitational force. This is what raises the temperature of the earth, as we all know when we go from the bottom of the mountain to the top and find out that we need a jacket because it's colder. The effect is the well known atmospheric lapse rate which is about 7o Centigrade per kilometer of altitude. The heating of the earth from the atmosphere is from the heat due to the adiabatic compression of the atmosphere. This is true for all planets with atmospheres.
As has been stated, the Greenhouse Gas theory originated from speculations by the 19th-Century physicist Arrhenius. This theory has never been verified with scientific experiments. There are a number of reasons that this is faulty science as shown in the following table.